Pulmonary surfactant is altered during mechanical ventilation of isolated rat lung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the lung injury induced by certain mechanical ventilation strategies is associated with changes in the pulmonary surfactant system. DESIGN: Analysis of the pulmonary surfactant system from isolated rat lungs after one of four different ventilatory strategies. SETTING: A research laboratory at a university. SUBJECTS: A total of 45 Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: Isolated lungs were randomized to either no ventilation (0-TIME) or to ventilation at 40 breaths/min in a humidified 37 degrees C chamber for either 30 mins or 120 mins with one of the following four strategies: a) control (CON, 7 mL/kg, 3 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure); b) medium volume, zero end-expiratory pressure (MVZP, 15 mL/kg, 0 cm H2O end-expiratory pressure); c) medium volume, high positive end-expiratory pressure (MVHP, 15 mL/kg, 9 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure); and d) high volume, zero end-expiratory pressure (HVZP, 40 mL/kg, 0 cm H2O end-expiratory pressure). MEASUREMENTS: Pressure-volume curves were determined before and after the ventilation period, after which the lungs were lavaged for surfactant analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Compared with 0-TIME, 30 mins of ventilation with the HVZP strategy or 120 mins of ventilation with CON and MVZP strategies caused a significant decrease in compliance. Groups showing a decreased compliance had significant increases in the amount of surfactant, surfactant large aggregates, and total lavage protein compared with 0-TIME. CONCLUSIONS: A short period of injurious mechanical ventilation can cause a decrease in lung compliance that is associated with a large influx of proteins into the alveolar space and with alterations of the pulmonary surfactant system. The changes of surfactant in these experiments are different from those seen in acute lung injury, indicating that they may represent an initial response to mechanical ventilation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".