Synthesis of some new 1-aryl-4-formyl-3-(4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-oxo-2<i>H</i>-pyran-3-yl)pyrazoles using the Vilsmeier–Haack reaction — Isolation of the key intermediate 1-aryl-3-(4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-oxo-2<i>H</i>-pyran-3-yl)pyrazoles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arylhydrazones of dehydroacetic acid (DHA) underwent Vilsmeier–Haack reaction to generate the corresponding 1-aryl-4-formyl-3-(4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-oxo-2H-pyran-3-yl)pyrazoles (1) with the pyrone moiety of the DHA remaining intact. However, when the reaction was performed using 1 equiv. of the reagent, compounds of 1-aryl-3-(4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-oxo-2H-pyran-3-yl)pyrazoles (2a–2f) were obtained, which underwent smooth conversion to 1-aryl-4-formyl-3-(4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-oxo-2H-pyran-3-yl)pyrazoles (1) on further treatment with another equivalent of the Vilsmeier–Haack reagent. This unreported observation suggests the intermediacy of 1-aryl-3-(4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-oxo-2H-pyran-3-yl)pyrazoles (2) in Vilsmeier–Haack reactions of hydrazones with a pyrone moiety. Several analogous compounds were also prepared using arylhydrazones of DHA.Key words: dehydroacetic acid, pyrazoles, Vilsmeier–Haack reaction, 3-acetyl-4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it