MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035397015 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.02.059

Validation of a Single Tank, Multi-mode Solar-assisted Heat Pump TRNSYS Model

2014· article· en· W2035397015 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carsen Banister, William Robert Wagar, Michael R. Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRNSYSStorage tankHeat pumpStratification (seeds)EngineeringHeat exchangerBenchmark (surveying)Nuclear engineeringWork (physics)Marine engineeringSimulationEnvironmental scienceMechanical engineeringMeteorologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work explores the operation and performance of a solar-assisted heat pump (SAHP) system which employs a single domestic hot water (DHW) tank. The solar heat source is connected to the storage tank via a heat pump and heat exchanger, which operate in parallel paths, providing multiple modes of operation. A TRNSYS (TRaNsient SYstem Simulations Tool) model of this SAHP system is validated using a purpose-built experimental test apparatus. The main goals of the validation are to: benchmark accuracy, identify strengths and weaknesses, and build confidence in the model. The model will be used to conduct more advanced studies supporting the development of similar SAHP system configurations. Both the system and model are operated and monitored for representative days from typical meteorological year (TMY) data for Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. The agreement between simulation and experiment was found to be very strong, with typical differences in average DHW tank temperatures of less than 1 C°. The DHW tank model does bring forth some issues, as simulated stratification can often differ appreciably from experimental stratification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsFrench-language works237,207