Book Review: Elizabeth Cary. <em>The Tragedy of Mariam: The Fair Queen of Jewry</em>. Ed Stephanie Hodgson-Wright. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Literary Texts, 2000.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
sage, body, Shakespeare.So it goes.Hand D does more than represent Shakespeare; it resurrects him.The final article, by Leeds Barroll, 'Assessing "Cultural Influence": James I as Patron of the Arts' (132), focuses on history.Barroll states that James I took extensive measures 'to assure his physical security at the accession' (139).That, coupled with James's interest in the highly physical activity of hunting, rather than in theater productions, finalizes the idea that this volume deals with more than abstractions, and that actors' bodies, the bodies of the audience, even the question of our interest in bodies, may lead us closer to understanding the now long decayed mind-bodies of early moderns who actually lived, as well as to an understanding of the literature they produced.The twenty-one book reviews (165) that make up the rest of the volume are delightfully useful at guiding one's reading.Many of the reviews lead back to the essays.This is clearly so in Jonathan Dollimore's review of George Minois' History of Suicide (240) and Jonathan Gil Harris's review of Michael C. Schoenfeld's Bodies and Selves in Early Modern England.(252).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".