MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035449186 · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2013.6488445

Utility function for predicting IPTV Quality of Experience based on delay in Overlay Networks

2013· article· en· W2035449186 on OpenAlexaff
Imad Abdeljaouad, A. Karmouch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkQuality of experienceIPTVOverlayOverlay networkQuality of serviceOverhead (engineering)Network packetVideo qualityPacket lossThe InternetDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Service Overlay Networks (SONs) provide new complex services in the Internet without requiring major changes to underlying physical networks. A SON is an overlay network made up of virtual nodes and links on top of the existing infrastructure. Whenever a client requests a specific service, such as streaming a video on his mobile device, the SON creates a path on the fly to deliver the video stream from the server to the client. This path is called a Service Specific Overlay Network (SSON) and consists of nodes that meet the Quality of Service (QoS), Quality of Experience (QoE), and technical requirements of the user. Unfortunately, the highly dynamic nature of overlay networks makes it challenging to keep video quality at the required levels. Errors and delays due mainly to congestion cause packets to be dropped or queued for a long period of time in intermediate nodes. Video quality is greatly affected by such impairments. In this paper, we propose a utility function to predict QoE of video delivered over SSONs. The proposed function is based on application-level statistical information, namely frame delay. It allows user QoE to be monitored in real-time without incurring additional overhead on the network. When degradation in the utility is detected, appropriate adaptation schemes can be used to restore the QoE to acceptable levels. We show the effectiveness and flexibility of the proposed scheme via mathematical proofs and simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207