X-ray Microscopy Studies of Protein Adsorption on a Phase Segregated Polystyrene/Polymethylmethacrylate Surface. 2. Effect of pH on Site Preference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
X-ray photoemission electron microscopy (XPEEM) using synchrotron radiation illumination has been used to study the adsorption of human serum albumin (HSA) onto a phase segregated polystyrene/polymethylmethacrylate (PS/PMMA) blend surface from solutions of five different pH values. The absolute coverage of albumin on each of three chemically distinct components of the surface, PS domains, PMMA domains, and the interface between the domains, was determined from a quantitative analysis of C 1s image sequences. At all pH values, the preferred adsorption site is the interface. At neutral pH (7.0), albumin showed a slight preference for PS regions relative to PMMA. At strongly acidic pH (2.0) and strongly basic pH (10.0), similar amounts of albumin adsorb on the PS and PMMA regions. However, at pH 4.0, the amount of albumin adsorbed on PMMA domains is approximately 1.6 times greater than that on PS domains, while at pH 8.6 the amount of albumin adsorbed on PMMA is one-half that adsorbed on PS domains. The pH dependence of the site preference is rationalized in terms of the known changes of albumin conformation with pH [Peters, T., Jr. All About Albumin: Biochemistry, Genetics, and Medical Applications; Academic Press: New York, 1995]. We infer from our results that the site preference of albumin adsorption on PS/PMMA blends is related mainly to changes in hydrophobic interactions, which are driven by pH-dependent electrostatic effects, that is, changes to the protein surface structure as the charge on the protein changes. The results provide insight into changes in the secondary structure of albumin in acid and basic media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".