MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035580307 · doi:10.1055/s-2002-23159

Advanced Imaging of the Postoperative Orthopedic Patient

2002· article· en· W2035580307 on OpenAlexaff
Lawrence M. White

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrthopedic surgeryOrthopedic ProceduresMedical physicsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Along with increasing development and utilization of orthopedic reconstructive surgical techniques and the recognized value of cross-sectional imaging in the assessment of musculoskeletal pathology and orthopedic treatment planning, has come an increasing demand for accurate cross-sectional imaging of the orthopedic patient following surgical intervention. Such imaging serves an important role in the noninvasive assessment of the postoperative status of the surgical procedure performed as well as a critical role in the assessment of recurrent, residual, or new symptoms following surgery. Such symptoms may be related to failure or complication of the surgical procedure or related to other causes of symptoms anatomically localized in a nonspecific manner to the operative site. Meaningful evaluation of imaging findings in patients following orthopedic surgery has necessitated an increased understanding on the part of the interpreting radiologist, of the basic principles and mechanics of orthopedic procedures. While an extensive review of orthopedic surgical techniques is well beyond the scope of this issue of the journal, many of the basic and fundamental orthopedic surgical procedures and principles have been reviewed in the context of the focus of the articles of the journal. Also reviewed are a number of important imaging hardware advances and technical optimizations which may serve to improve the quality of cross-sectional imaging studies following orthopedic procedures and possible instrumentation. The potential clinical utility and value of advanced cross-sectional imaging in the assessment of the postoperative orthopedic patient is being assessed in a seemingly ever-evolving fashion in the current radiologic and orthopedic literature. The authors contributing to this issue focusing on advanced imaging of the postoperative orthopedic patient have each shared their expertise and knowledge in this area and I wish to thank each of them for their efforts and outstanding work. I would also like to thank Dr David Karasick and Dr Mark Schweitzer for allowing me the privilege of serving as a guest editor of the Seminars in Muscuoskeletal Radiology and for their help and encouragement in putting together this issue of the journal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in Musculoskeletal RadiologySame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207