Isolation and characterization of factor I of the bovine complement system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To isolate and characterize factor I of the bovine complement system. Sample Population-Serum obtained from the blood of beef cattle. PROCEDURES: Serum samples were fractionated to yield factor I by means of sequential precipitation, ion-exchange, and gel-filtration chromatography. The protein was identified throughout the procedure on the basis of its ability to degrade the alpha'-chain of bovine C3b in the presence of bovine factor H. Electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels was used to assess the degradation of C3b and determine the molecular weights of factor I and its component polypeptide chains. RESULTS: Bovine factor I had an apparent molecular weight of 94 kd and consisted of 2 disulfide-bonded polypeptides that had apparent molecular weights of 51 and 42 kd (under reducing conditions). Factor H was required for the factor I cleavage of the alpha'-chain of bovine C3b into iC3b. A similar cofactor effect was provided by trypsinized bovine erythrocytes or erythrocyte ghosts. Bovine properdin was prepared and shown to be a single polypeptide chain of 58 kd in the reduced form. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Bovine factor I can be purified from serum by a simple 4-step procedure. It is structurally and functionally comparable to factor I of other species, and its purification completes the isolation and characterization of all the soluble components of the bovine alternative complement pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".