MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035661185 · doi:10.1071/rdv27n1ab47

47 THE AVIAN CHORIO-ALLANTOIC MEMBRANE: A SUITABLE SHORT-TERM CULTURE SYSTEM FOR BOVINE OVARIAN TISSUE

2014· article· en· W2035661185 on OpenAlexaff
Kylie Beck, Jaswant Singh, M. Anzar

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvarian CortexAndrologyBiologyIn ovoCryopreservationTissue cultureIn vitroIncubationEmbryo cultureOvaryEmbryoEndocrinologyCell biologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Successful cryopreservation of bovine ovarian tissue holds enormous potential for long-term maintenance of female gametes to preserve genetic diversity by tissue banking. Traditionally, in vitro culture followed by histopathological examination has been used to assess the post-thaw viability of cryopreserved tissues. Recently, in ovo transplantation of mammalian tissues on the chorio-allantoic membrane (CAM) of a growing chicken embryo has emerged as an alternative method for short-term culture. The purpose of this experiment was to compare CAM culture of bovine ovarian tissue over a 5-day period with the in vitro culture system. Fertilized White Leghorn eggs were incubated at 37°C and 62% relative humidity. A window (1 × 2 cm) was cut into the eggshell on Day 3 of incubation. Ovaries were retrieved from a local abattoir and brought to the laboratory within 6 h. Ovarian cortex pieces (1–2 mm3) were randomly assigned to control, CAM-culture, or in vitro-culture groups. Control-group tissues were fixed immediately in 4% paraformaldehyde. The CAM was traumatized on Day 10 of incubation to expose the underlying blood vessels, and tissue pieces were grafted at the site (one graft per egg). For in vitro culture, the ovarian cortex pieces were placed on tissue culture inserts within 6-well plates containing TCM199 with 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium, 100 mIU mL–1 of FSH, 100 IU mL–1 of penicillin, and 50 µg mL–1 of streptomycin and incubated at 38°C in 5% CO2. Ovarian tissues from the CAM and in vitro culture group were removed on Day 1, 3, and 5 of grafting/culture, fixed, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 µm, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and analysed under a light microscope. The numbers of normal and degenerated follicles (indicating follicle survival) and number of blood vessels containing bovine and avian red blood cells (indicating angiogenesis) were counted using standard stereological procedures. All ovarian cortex grafts from surviving chick embryos showed adhesion with the CAM and a marked neo-vascularization in the graft areas. Gross and histological examination revealed the circulation of avian blood cells in ovarian stromal vessels with a concomitant decrease in the number of bovine blood vessels over the incubation period. Total follicle densities (mean ± s.e.m.) on Day 1, 3, and 5 were 13.3 ± 5.9, 27.9 ± 6.7, and 36.9 ± 7.3 in the in vitro-cultured group and 36.7 ± 13.0, 73.6 ± 24.0, and 44.02 ± 12.67 per millimeter cubed in the CAM-cultured group, respectively. Overall, total follicle density was higher in the CAM-cultured group (P < 0.05). Likewise, the normal follicle densities on Day 1, 3, and 5 were 10.4 ± 4.9, 15.5 ± 3.6, and 20.7 ± 6.3 in the in vitro-cultured group and 30.5 ± 8.5, 45.7 ± 18.4, and 22.7 ± 7.3 per millimeter cubed in the CAM-cultured group (P > 0.05). In conclusion, in ovo CAM grafting system was as successful as the in vitro-culture system and may be considered an acceptable alternative to the traditional in vitro-culture system for bovine ovarian tissue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.421
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207