MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035688890 · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.05.020

Outcomes of Human Leukocyte Antigen–Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Myeloablative Versus Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens

2014· article· en· W2035688890 on OpenAlexaff
Ronald Sobecks, José F. Leis, Robert Peter Gale, Kwang Woo Ahn, Xiaochun Zhu, Mitchell Sabloff, Marcos de Lima, Jennifer R. Brown, Yoshihiro Inamoto, Gregory A. Hale, Mahmoud Aljurf, Rammurti T. Kamble, Jack W. Hsu, Steven Z. Pavletic, Baldeep Wirk, Matthew D. Seftel, Ian D. Lewis, Edwin P. Alyea, Jörge E. Cortes, Matt Kalaycio, Richard T. Maziarz, Wael Saber

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
FundersNational Cancer InstituteOffice of Naval ResearchNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteOnyx PharmaceuticalsMedacSwedish Orphan BiovitrumIncyteGenentechSeattle GeneticsUniversity of UtahBlue Cross and Blue Shield AssociationKiadis PharmaTherakosSigma-Tau PharmaceuticalsChimerixMedical College of WisconsinTarix PharmaceuticalsStemCyteUniversity of MinnesotaOtsuka America PharmaceuticalAmgenAllos TherapeuticsActinium PharmaceuticalsAriad PharmaceuticalsNational Marrow Donor ProgramSt. Baldrick's FoundationNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterOsiris TherapeuticsCelgeneWellPointSanofiMerckGlaxoSmithKlineLeukemia and Lymphoma SocietyBe The Match Foundation
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineTransplantationGastroenterologyConfidence intervalChronic lymphocytic leukemiaHematopoietic stem cell transplantationSurgeryLeukemiaOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can cure some chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) subjects. This study compared outcomes of myeloablative (MA) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) transplants from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD) for CLL. From 1995 to 2007, information regarding 297 CLL subjects was reported to the Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research; of these, 163 underwent MA and 134 underwent RIC MSD HCT. The MA subjects underwent transplantation less often after 2000 and less commonly received antithymocyte globulin (4% versus 13%, P = .004) or prior antibody therapy (14% versus 53%; P < .001). RIC was associated with a greater likelihood of platelet recovery and less grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease compared with MA conditioning. One- and 5-year treatment-related mortality (TRM) were 24% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 16% to 33%) versus 37% (95% CI, 30% to 45%; P = .023), and 40% (95% CI, 29% to 51%) versus 54% (95% CI, 46% to 62%; P = .036), respectively, and the relapse/progression rates at 1 and 5 years were 21% (95% CI, 14% to 29%) versus 10% (95% CI, 6% to 15%; P = .020), and 35% (95% CI, 26% to 46%) versus 17% (95% CI, 12% to 24%; P = .003), respectively. MA conditioning was associated with better progression-free (PFS) (relative risk, .60; 95% CI, .37 to .97; P = .038) and 3-year survival in transplantations before 2001, but for subsequent years, RIC was associated with better PFS and survival (relative risk, 1.49 [95% CI, .92 to 2.42]; P = .10; and relative risk, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.11 to 3.13]; P = .019). Pretransplantation disease status was the most important predictor of relapse (P = .003) and PFS (P = .0007) for both forms of transplantation conditioning. MA and RIC MSD transplantations are effective for CLL. Future strategies to decrease TRM and reduce relapses are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207