MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035738106 · doi:10.4141/cjps09173

Effect of fungicidal seed treatments on the emergence, development, and grain yield of Fusarium graminearum-infected wheat and barley seed under field conditions

2010· article· en· W2035738106 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
William E. May, M. R. Fernandez, G. P. Lafond

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersBayer CropScienceMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsBiologyFusariumFungicideAgronomySowingGerminationSeedlingHordeum vulgareSeed treatmentGrain yieldSeedingHorticulturePoaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In areas affected by Fusarium head blight, growers are concerned about planting seed infected with Fusarium graminearum. This study evaluated the effects of commercially available fungicidal seed treatments on the emergence, development, and grain yield of Fusarium-infected seed of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), durum wheat [T. turgidum L. ssp. durum (Desf.) Husn.], and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Infected seedlots were treated with 12 combinations of seed-applied fungicides; nine of these are currently registered in Canada. In addition, five experimental products were used. The experiment was conducted over three years (2003-2005) at four locations in eastern Saskatchewan. Common wheat was grown in all 3 yr, durum wheat in 2003 and 2004, and barley in 2004 and 2005. In the seedlot with the highest level of F. graminearum infection (63%), fungicidal seed treatments improved plant emergence and grain yield. In the three seedlots with moderate levels of infections (25 to 35%), seed treatments improved emergence, but did not significantly affect grain yield. In four seedlots with lower levels of F. graminearum infection (5 to 10%) seed treatments had no significant effect on emergence or grain yield. By adjusting the seeding rate, based on percent germination needed to achieve a target plant density of 200 plants m-2 reductions in grain yield were prevented except in the seedlot with the highest level of infection. However, actual plant density was often below the target plant density, which indicates that field seedling mortality was greater than the 5% assumed when determining the seeding rates. Seed treatments did not significantly affect the test weight in the harvested grain. In conclusion, fungicidal seed treatments did not consistently improve the agronomic performance of F. graminearum-infected common wheat, durum wheat, or barley seed in eastern Saskatchewan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2010
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207