Functional role of myocardial electrical remodeling in diabetic rabbits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the study was to investigate the role of electrical remodeling of the ventricular myocardium in hemodynamic impairment and the development of arrhythmogenic substrate. Experiments were conducted with 11 healthy and 12 diabetic (alloxan model, 4 weeks) rabbits. Left ventricular pressure was monitored and unipolar electrograms were recorded from 64 epicardial leads. Aortic banding was used to provoke arrhythmia. The diabetic rabbits had prolonged QTc, with activation-recovery intervals (surrogates for repolarization durations) being relatively short on the left ventricular base and long on the anterior apical portions of both ventricles (P < 0.05). In the diabetic rabbits, a negative correlation (-0.726 to -0.817) was observed between dP/dt(max), dP/dt(min), and repolarization dispersions. Under conditions of systolic overload (5 min), tachyarrhythmias were equally rare and the QTc and activation-recovery intervals were shortened in both groups (P < 0.05), whereas QRS was prolonged in the diabetic rabbits only. The repolarization shortening was more pronounced on the apex, which led to the development of apicobasal and interventricular end of repolarization gradients in the healthy animals, and to the flattening of the repolarization profile in the diabetic group. Thus, the diabetes-related pattern of ventricular repolarization was associated with inotropic and lusitropic impairment of the cardiac pump function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".