MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035746336 · doi:10.2118/155112-ms

Modelling of Enhanced Scale Control via Inhibition of Stimulation Fluids for Deepwater Developments

2012· article· en· W2035746336 on OpenAlexaff
Oleg Ishkov, Eric Mackay, M. M. Jordan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsNalco (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaPetroleum engineeringSeawaterSoftware deploymentCompletion (oil and gas wells)Scale (ratio)PerforationSubmarine pipelineCarbonateWater injection (oil production)Drilling fluidEnvironmental scienceEngineeringProcess engineeringDrillingMarine engineeringGeologyMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringGeotechnical engineeringMetallurgyPhysicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The injection of seawater into oil bearing reservoirs to maintain reservoir pressure and improve secondary recovery is a well-established, mature operation. Moreover, the degree of risk posed by deposition of mineral scales (carbonate/sulphate) to the injection and production wells during such operations has been much studied. The current deepwater subsea developments offshore West Africa, Gulf of Mexico and Brazil have brought into sharp focus the need to manage scale in an effective way. In recent years there has been some consideration given to deployment of scale inhibitor within the fluids associated with the completion of production wells, prior to the start up of production. Until now, effective scale control in frac packed wells at low water cuts has been achieved with phosphonate-based inhibitors applied as part of the acid perforation wash and overflush stages, prior to the actual frac packing operation itself. The deployment of these inhibitors has proved effective in controlling barium sulphate scale formation during initial seawater production, and eliminating the need to scale squeeze the wells at low water cuts (<10% BS&W). Recent developments allowing inclusion of scale inhibitor in the linear and cross linked gel stages has highlighted the need to be able to model this process effectively, thereby enabling optimal use of the chemical and improved squeeze designs. This paper outlines simulation work carried out using the Petroleum Experts REVEAL software to assess introduction of scale inhibitor into frac pack operations, and identify the most suitable stage of the well completion process during which to apply the inhibitor, to maximise treatment life. Simulation results and field data from these treatments are compared to demonstrate the opportunity this technique presents, and to highlight the importance of chemical placement and the post stimulation flow regime to squeeze life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207