MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035759687 · doi:10.1159/000091854

Pseudoclosure of Anterior Fontanelle by Wormian Bone in Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis

2006· article· en· W2035759687 on OpenAlexaff
Deepak Agrawal, Paul Steinbok, D. Douglas Cochrane

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Neurosurgery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnterior fontanelleFontanelleMedicineCraniosynostosisSagittal sutureSurgerySkullHydrocephalus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Although syndromic craniosynostosis is one of the causes for early closure of the anterior fontanelle, there is no literature on the incidence and causes of fontanelle closure in isolated single-suture craniosynostosis. The objective of this study was to review the incidence of fontanelle closure by a wormian bone in isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intraoperative records of 100 consecutive children under 1 year of age, operated for isolated sagittal synostosis over a 14-year period (1987- 2000), were reviewed to identify the presence of a wormian bone closing the anterior fontanelle. RESULTS: The median age at surgery was 4.2 months with a range of 1.9-11.7 months. Intraoperatively, a wormian bone was seen replacing the anterior fontanelle in 4 cases giving an incidence of 4%. CONCLUSIONS: A wormian bone can occupy the anterior fontanelle in children with isolated sagittal craniosynostosis giving the appearance of a 'closed fontanelle'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric NeurosurgerySame topicCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207