Changes in force-velocity properties of trachealis due to oscillatory strains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The physically dynamic environment of the lung constantly modulates the mechanical properties of airway smooth muscle. In vitro experiments have shown that contractility of the muscle is compromised by oscillatory strains, perhaps through disruption of cross-bridge interaction and organization of the contractile filaments. To understand the mechanism by which oscillation affects contractility, functional changes of the muscle in terms of force-velocity relationship were assessed before and after imposition of length oscillation in both relaxed and activated states. The oscillation protocol was designed to reduce isometric force by 15-20%, followed by measurement of force-velocity properties. Maximal velocity and power changed by +8 and -14%, respectively, after oscillation applied in the relaxed state and changed by -15 and -25%, respectively, after oscillation applied during contraction. A simple model of reduced activation could not account for the results; neither could the results be explained satisfactorily by the current cross-bridge theory of contraction. The results, however, could be explained if the possibility of reorganization of the contractile filaments due to oscillatory strains was considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".