MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035807739 · doi:10.1149/1.3606475

Characterizations of LBC-GDC Composite Cathodes for Low Temperature SOFCs

2011· article· en· W2035807739 on OpenAlexaff
Ruhul Amin, Ben Kenney, Kunal Karan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite numberDielectric spectroscopyElectrolyteLanthanum oxideAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrodeSolid oxide fuel cellOxideLanthanumComposite materialBarium oxideThermal expansionElectrochemistryInorganic chemistryChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study reports on the physico-electro-chemical characterization of porous composite electrodes made of lanthanum-barium-cobalt oxide (LBC) electrocatalyst and gadolinium-doped-cerium oxide (GDC) oxygen-ion conductor. Four different compositions of LBC-GDC composite electrodes were fabricated and heat-treated at 1150°C. The phase purity of the heat-treated LBC-GDC composite was checked by X-ray diffraction measurements. Thermal expansion coefficient (TEC) was measured from room temperature to 900°C. Porous LBC-GDC composite electrodes were studied in a symmetrical cell configuration by impedance spectroscopy where gadolinium doped ceria (GDC) was used as a solid electrolyte. Impedance spectra obtained at zero dc bias conditions consisted of two semi-circular arcs, which indicate that the overall oxygen reduction comprises at least two distinct processes. The area specific resistance (ASR) for electrode polarization was measured in the 600–800°C temperature ranges. The lowest ASR value of 0.06 Ω cm−2 at 600°C was exhibited by LBC/GDC composite of composition 60/40. The ASR values at lower temperatures offer the promise of utilizing composite as a cathode for low-temperature SOFCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207