MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035823468 · doi:10.1021/om900176v

A Combined Experimental and Computational Study of Unexpected C−F Bond Activation Intermediates and Selectivity in the Reaction of Pentafluorobenzene with a (PEt<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Ni Synthon

2009· article· en· W2035823468 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel A. Johnson, Erin T. Taylor, S.J. Cruise

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicFluorine in Organic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAdductMoietySynthonSelectivityReaction mechanismStereochemistryAnthraceneActivation energyReaction intermediateMedicinal chemistryPhotochemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction of the anthracene adduct (PEt 3 ) 2 Ni(η 2 -C 14 H 10 ) with C 6 F 5 H or C 6 F 6 provides a facile route to the isolable dinuclear adducts [(PEt 3 ) 2 Ni] 2 (μ-η 2:η 2 -C 6 F 5 H) and [(PEt 3 ) 2 Ni] 2 (μ-η 2:η 2 -C 6 F 6 ). The Ni(PEt 3 ) 2 moieties reside on opposite faces of the fluoroarene ring, and bond lengths indicate considerable loss of aromaticity. Solutions of [(PEt 3 ) 2 Ni] 2 (μ-η 2:η 2 -C 6 F 5 H) with added C 6 F 5 H convert with >97% selectivity to the ortho -F activated compound tran s-(PEt 3 ) 2 NiF(2,3,4,5-C 6 F 4 H). The addition of C 6 F 5 H to solutions of [(PEt 3 ) 2 Ni] 2 (μ-η 2:η 2 -C 6 F 5 H) also provided equilibrium amounts of the mononuclear complex (PEt 3 ) 2 Ni(η 2 -C 6 F 5 H) and the C−H activation product trans- (PEt 3 ) 2 NiH(C 6 F 5 ) as intermediates. Increased C 6 F 5 H concentrations accelerate the rate of C−F bond activation. The reaction of (PEt 3 ) 4 Ni with C 6 F 5 H under similar conditions also provided spectroscopic evidence for the presence of the binuclear adduct [(PEt 3 ) 2 Ni] 2 (μ-η 2:η 2 -C 6 F 5 H), the mononuclear adduct (PEt 3 ) 2 Ni(η 2 -C 6 F 5 H), and the C−H activation product trans- (PEt 3 ) 2 NiH(C 6 F 5 ) in the reaction mixture; however, unlike the C−F bond activation observed from pure [(PEt 3 ) 2 Ni] 2 (μ-η 2:η 2 -C 6 F 5 H) and C 6 F 5 H, the reaction of Ni(PEt 3 ) 4 and C 6 F 5 H yields a mixture of C−F activation products that included the para -F and meta -F activation products as major products. This indicates that alternate mechanisms of C−F activation dominate with this source of the Ni(PEt 3 ) 2 moiety under these conditions, suggestive of a radical mechanism. Density functional theory calculations were carried out to provide insight into the 19 F NMR spectra of these complexes, as well as to gain understanding of the importance of phosphine donor choice in the thermodynamics of the interconversion of the dinuclear complexes, mononuclear complexes, and C−H activation products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicFluorine in Organic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207