Safety and Immunogenicity of a 13-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Infants and Toddlers Given With Routine Pediatric Vaccinations in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The global distribution of pneumococcal disease and emergence of nonvaccine pneumococcal serotypes prompted the development of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13), with broader coverage than 7-valent PCV (PCV7). This study compared compatibility of PCV13 and PCV7 with concurrently administered diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine, and meningococcal C conjugate vaccine (menC), and assessed the safety and immunogenicity of PCV13. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized trial, children received PCV7 or PCV13 at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months with routine vaccinations. One month following the infant series and toddler dose, the responses to Hib, pertussis, menC, and specific pneumococcal serotypes were measured. Safety and tolerability were assessed daily for 4 days by parents. RESULTS: Subjects received PCV13 (n = 300) or PCV7 (n = 303); immunogenicity assessment was completed in 265 and 268 subjects, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in responses to Hib, pertussis, or menC after primary or booster vaccinations. More than 95% of subjects in the PCV13 group produced >0.35 μg/mL antibody to each pneumococcal serotype 1 month after the third dose, except with serotypes 23F (90%), 3 (80%), and 5 (87%). After the fourth dose, 98% to 100% of subjects achieved serotype-specific antibody concentrations >0.35 μg/mL, except for serotype 3 (85%). Safety and tolerability did not differ between groups with respect to local or systemic side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Responses to routine childhood vaccines did not differ with PCV7 or PCV13 coadministration. Serotype-specific pneumococcal antibody concentrations were protective. The safety profile of PCV13 was favorable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".