Outcomes of an Occupational Therapy School-Based Consultation Service for Students with Fine Motor Difficulties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: This paper reports on a study that was conducted to address the perceived occupational performance changes among school-aged children who received occupational therapy services for fine motor difficulties. It also addressed teacher awareness and the degree of implementation of occupational therapy recommendations by teachers. METHODS: The study sample included 91 school-aged children referred for occupational therapy services for fine motor difficulties. The children were assessed, before and after intervention. Outcome measures used were the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and the Teacher Awareness Scale (TAS). RESULTS: Significant change scores in both scales of the COPM were (Performance = 1.50, p < 0.001; Satisfaction = 1.92, p < 0.001). Regression analyses showed that lower teacher ratings of the students'performance and satisfaction of performance on the initial COPM resulted in significantly greater COPM change scores in the students'performance and satisfaction of performance at reassessment. The greater the degree of implementation of occupational therapy strategies by the teacher, the greater the COPM performance and satisfaction change scores. The greater the degree of teacher awareness of students'special needs resulted in greater COPM performance change scores. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Teachers may benefit from more education regarding fine motor difficulties in children and how the implementation of occupational therapy strategies are helpful to improve children's fine motor difficulties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".