MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035943650 · doi:10.1182/blood-2002-11-3572

T-cell developmental blockage by tachykinin antagonists and the role of hemokinin 1 in T lymphopoiesis

2003· article· en· W2035943650 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Zhang, Christopher J. Paige

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphopoiesisParacrine signallingCD8BiologyTachykinin receptorHaematopoiesisCD44T cellAutocrine signallingCell growthCell biologyInternal medicineIL-2 receptorEndocrinologyImmunologyChemistryIn vitroStem cellReceptorImmune systemNeuropeptideBiochemistryMedicineSubstance P

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemokinin 1 (HK-1) is a new member of the tachykinin peptide family that is expressed in hematopoietic cells. Recent reports studying mouse, rat, and human orthologs of HK-1 demonstrate a broader distribution than originally reported. Our previous studies demonstrated that HK-1, by promoting proliferation, survival, and possibly maturation of B-cell precursors, plays an important role in B lymphopoiesis. Here we present data showing that HK-1 also influences T-cell development at a similar stage of differentiation. This peptide enhanced the proliferation of T-cell precursors and increased the number of thymocytes in fetal thymus organ cultures (FTOCs). Tachykinin antagonists, on the other hand, greatly reduced the cellularity of thymi both in vivo and in vitro. The major reduction occurred in the CD4/CD8 double-positive (DP) cells and the CD44-CD25+ subset of the CD4/CD8 double-negative (DN) cells. Of note, these populations also express HK-1, raising the possibility of autocrine or paracrine pathways influencing T-cell development as we previously reported for B-cell development. Consistent with this, the detrimental effect of tachykinin antagonists could be partially overcome with exogenous HK-1 peptide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207