Expression of erythropoietin and its receptor in neuroblastomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children with high-risk neuroblastomas (NB) potentially may benefit from treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo). Epo is a stimulator of erythropoiesis, acting through its receptor (EpoR). The objective of the current study was to evaluate expression levels of Epo and EpoR in NB and in normal tissues and their effects on the proliferation of tumor cells. METHODS: A tissue microarray study was performed with 101 primary tumors, 39 paired metastases, 56 paired control tissues, and 6 human NB cell lines. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using antibodies against Epo and EpoR. Immunostaining intensity was evaluated by using a semiquantitative score based on the percentage of positive cells. An in vitro analysis of cell proliferation and cell cycle in the presence of recombinant Epo was performed in the 6 cell lines. RESULTS: The expression of EpoR was found to be significantly higher in tumors than in paired control tissues (P < .0001) compared with the expression of Epo (P = .06), and the expression of EpoR was significantly higher in lymph node metastases than in paired primary tumors (P = .02) compared with Epo (P = .99). Survival analysis demonstrated that the patients who had tumors with the highest expression of EpoR had a significantly better overall survival (P = .03). In the in vitro study, recombinant Epo did not modify proliferation and cell cycle in the cell lines regardless of the EpoR expression level. CONCLUSIONS: Epo and EpoR were expressed in NB but did not modify tumor cell proliferation. The results of the current study suggested that Epo may be used safely for supportive care in children with NB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".