New Insights into the Mechanism of Triplet Radical-Pair Combinations. The Persistent Radical Effect Masks the Distinction between In-Cage and Out-of-Cage Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Steady-state and laser-pulsed irradiations of dibenzyl ketone (ACOB0) and derivatives with a p-methyl or a p-hexadecyl chain (ACOB1 and ACOB16, respectively) have been conducted in polyethylene films with 0, 46, and 68% crystallinities. Calculation of the fractions of in-cage combinations of the triplet benzylic radical-pair intermediates based on photoproduct yields, Fc, from ACOB16 are shown to be incorrect as a result of the kinetic consequences of drastically different diffusion coefficients for the benzyl and p-hexadecylbenzyl radicals. Careful analyses of the transient absorption traces, based upon a new model developed here, allow the correct cage effects to be determined even from ACOB0. The model also permits the rate constants for radical-pair combinations and escape from their cage of origin to be calculated using either an iterative fitting procedure or a very simple one which requires only k-CO and the intensities of the transient absorption immediately after the flash and after the in-cage portion of reaction by the benzylic radicals is completed. Values of the rate constant for decarbonylation of the initially formed arylacetyl radicals, k-CO, have been measured from the rise portions of the laser-flash transient absorption traces. They confirm the assertion from results in liquid alkane media that decarbonylation rates are independent of microviscosity. The data separate components of a reaction from an (in-cage) "cage effect" and an (out-of-cage) "persistent radical effect" that are responsible for formation of AB-type (i.e., decarbonylated) products. The effects here are a consequence of vastly different rates of diffusion for coreacting A. and B. benzylic radicals rather than segregation of the radicals in different parts of a hetereogeneous environment (which leads to an excess of AA and BB products). Heretofore, observation of exclusive formation of AB products has been attributed to in-cage combinations of geminate radical pairs. We show that not to be the case here and provide methodologies which may be used for testing the importance of the "persistent radical effect" component of reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".