MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036096415 · doi:10.1139/p02-114

The ice-related research of Harry Kiefte and co-workers

2003· article· en· W2036096415 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
M. J. Clouter

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersCold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
KeywordsBrillouin zonePhysicsEngineering physicsCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Harry Kiefte (1942–1997) was born in Amsterdam and moved to Toronto at an early age where he completed his formal education. His Ph.D. research was in the field of electron paramagnetic resonance under J.S.M. Harvey at the University of Toronto. He then completed two years of postdoctoral study with B.P. Stoicheff at the same institution where he participated in the pioneering work that led to the recording of the first Brillouin spectra from single crystals of rare-gas solids and the consequent determination of the elastic constants for these materials. It was the technique of Brillouin spectroscopy, and its application to the determination of the elastic properties of a wide range of crystalline materials, that engaged his interest and very considerable talents for the remainder of his career at the Department of Physics, Memorial University, where he accepted a faculty position in 1973. At the time of his death, at the relatively young age of 54, his name appeared as author or co-author on approximately 90 publications. Included among the co-authors were four graduate students whose research was devoted to ice-related studies. It is this significant contribution to our knowledge of the elastic properties of ice that will be reviewed in this paper. PACS No.: 62.20Dc

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsFrench-language works237,207