Holocene migration of lodgepole pine ( <i>Pinus contorta</i> var. <i>latifolia</i> ) in southern Yukon, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A palynological reconstruction ( n = 25 profiles) suggests that the northern extent of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelmann ex S. Watson) occurred between 59° and 60°N latitude in northwest North America from 10,000 to 7000 calendar years before present (cal. yr BP) prior to entering Yukon. Although specific migration pathways could not be resolved with the available palynological data, mountains along the southern edge of Yukon appear to have diverted lodgepole pine migration through the Carcross and Frances Lake areas in southwest and southeast Yukon, respectively. Migration in the southwest (70 m/yr) was likely confined to lower elevations of the Yukon and Teslin river valleys, with lodgepole pine reaching 61°N ~2000 cal. yr BP. Along the eastern route, migration was channeled through a 15–20 km wide pass in a 200 km mountainous front. After breaching the Liard drainage divide north of Frances Lake ~4000 cal. yr BP, migration progressed northwest (160–220 m/yr) along the Tintina Trench. Lodgepole pine was estimated to have reached its near present-day northern limit (~63°N) ~1790 cal. yr BP, which is ~1290 years earlier than previously thought. This difference in arrival dates is due the use of a >5% rather than a >15% pine pollen content threshold, which appears to correspond with >1% pine tree cover in the landscape. Climatic cooling after 1000 cal. yr BP that caused a population decline at higher elevations is hypothesized to explain the present-day sparse and disjunct distribution of pine across Yukon north of 61°N.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".