Corticocortical Inhibition of Peripheral Inputs Within Primary Somatosensory Cortex: The Role of GABA<sub>A</sub> and GABA<sub>B</sub> Receptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A conditioning-test pulse paradigm was used in combination with microiontophoresis to examine the corticocortical modulation of somatosensory processing. Single-cell recordings were made in the glabrous digit representation of primary somatosensory (S1) cortex in anesthetized raccoons. Test stimulation of the periphery (the on-focus digit) was preceded by conditioning stimulation of the cortical area that represents an adjacent digit at interstimulus intervals ranging from 5 to 200 ms. An early and prolonged inhibitory modulation was produced in most of the 61 neurons examined, and an early facilitation followed by inhibition was produced in about one-third of the cells. Microiontophoretic administration of a potent GABA(B) receptor antagonist, CGP 55845, blocked the inhibition and in many cases revealed a facilitation of the sensory response. Microiontophoretic administration of a GABA(A) receptor antagonist, gabazine, blocked inhibition at short interstimulus intervals and reduced the longer inhibition by half. These results indicate that connections between glabrous digit representations within S1 cortex produce predominantly inhibitory modulation of sensory input and that both GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors contribute to this modulation. The relevance of these connections to the effects of peripheral nerve injury and subsequent reorganization is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".