MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036141789 · doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0236

Dynamics of body protein deposition and changes in body composition after sudden changes in amino acid intake: II. Entire male pigs1

2008· article· en· W2036141789 on OpenAlexaff
Héctor R. Martínez–Ramírez, E. A. Jeaurond, C. F. M. de Lange

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal scienceBody weightComposition (language)LimitingChemistryInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study was conducted to evaluate the extent and dynamics of whole body protein deposition (Pd) and changes in chemical and physical body composition after a period of AA intake restriction in entire male pigs with high lean-tissue growth potentials. Fifty-eight entire male pigs (initial BW 15.8 +/- 0.9 kg) were allotted to 1 of 3 dietary AA levels between 15 and 38 kg of BW: control (15% above requirements), AA-15% (15% below requirements), and AA-30% (30% below requirements). Thereafter, pigs were fed diets not limiting in AA content. Throughout the experiment, pigs were scale-fed at 90% of estimated voluntary daily DE intake. Representative pigs were slaughtered at 15, 38, 53, 68, or 110 kg of BW to monitor changes in body composition. Between 15 and 38 kg of BW, restriction of AA intake reduced BW gain (P < 0.01; 794, 666, and 648 g/d for control, AA-15%, and AA-30%, respectively). At 38 kg of BW, AA intake restriction increased whole body lipid (LB) content (P < 0.01; 11.3, 14.3, 17.5% of empty BW), and the LB-to-whole body protein (PB) ratio (LB/PB; P < 0.02; 0.68, 0.88, 1.10 for control, AA-15%, and AA-30%, respectively). Relationships between PB versus whole body water and PB versus whole body ash were not affected by dietary treatments (P > 0.10). At 110 kg of BW and based on BW, PB, and LB/PB, complete compensatory growth (CG) was achieved. Body weight gain between 38 and 110 kg of BW was inversely related to previous dietary AA levels (P < 0.01; 1,089, 1,171, and 1,185 g/d for control, AA-15%, and AA-30%, respectively). For pigs on the control diet, and based on N-balance data, Pd increased with BW, from 172 g/d at 40 kg of BW to 226 g/d at 82 kg of BW. At 40 kg of BW, Pd was greater (P < 0.05) for pigs on the AA-15% (205 g/d) and AA-30% (191 g/d) diets than pigs on the control diet (172 g/d). These findings indicate that pigs with high lean-tissue growth potentials are more likely to express compensatory Pd and their genetically determined upper limit to Pd (PdMax) after a period of AA intake restriction. This study confirms previous findings that BW effects on PdMax are small in growing pigs between 40 and 80 kg of BW. It is suggested that CG and compensatory Pd after a period of AA intake restriction is constrained by the pig's PdMax and is driven by a target LB/PB. Combined with previous observations in our laboratory, these results suggest that CG after a period of AA intake restriction tends to occur only when pigs are within the energy-dependent phase of lean-tissue growth and not when the genetically determined upper limit to lean-tissue growth, or PdMax, determines growth performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207