MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036161662 · doi:10.1111/jvim.12587

Acute Phase Proteins in Racehorses with Inflammatory Airway Disease

2015· article· en· W2036161662 on OpenAlex
Mathilde Leclère, A. Lavoie‐Lamoureux, Jean‐Pierre Lavoie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Veterinary Internal Medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Equine Medical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPfizer
KeywordsMedicineHaptoglobinSerum amyloid ABronchoalveolar lavageSerum Amyloid A ProteinExercise intoleranceAcute-phase proteinInflammationGastroenterologyHorseInternal medicinePopulationC-reactive proteinImmunologyAirwayLungSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation is observed in horses with heaves and could also be present in horses with a lesser degree of pulmonary inflammation. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: It was hypothesized that racehorses with inflammatory airway disease (IAD) have increased concentration of circulating acute phase proteins. The objective of this study was to compare serum acute phase proteins of racehorses with and without lower airway inflammation. ANIMALS: Serum from 21 client-owned Standardbred racehorses with exercise intolerance and lower airway inflammation and serum from 10 client-owned Standardbred racehorses with exercise intolerance without lower airway inflammation. METHODS: In a case-control study, serum samples from previously characterized horses presented for exercise intolerance with or without lower airway inflammation based on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytology were analyzed for serum amyloid A protein (SAA), C-reactive protein (CRP), and haptoglobin using commercial ELISAs. RESULTS: There was no significant differences between groups for SAA (non-IAD versus IAD, median (range): 3.47 (0.06-34.94) versus 6.33 (0.06-80) μg/mL, P = .49), CRP (10.87 (2.05-29.03) versus 4.63 (0.02-31.81) μg/mL, P = .23) or haptoglobin (900.36 (607.99-2018.84) versus 749.54 (530.81-1076.95) μg/mL, P = .09). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In this population of poorly performing racehorses in training, serum SAA, CRP, and haptoglobin were not helpful in distinguishing between horses with IAD from horses with exercise intolerance from other causes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it