Effects of Bcl-2 and Bcl-X<sub>L</sub> protein levels on chemoresistance of hepatoblastoma HepG2 cell line
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ratio between apoptotic promoters and repressors in the Bcl-2 family determines the chemosensitivity of cells to apoptotic stimuli. This study examines the chemoresistance of a transfected human hepatoblastoma HepG2 cell-line during Taxol and Doxorubicin application. Sense bcl-2, and anti-sense bcl-XL gene fragments were separately inserted into HepG2 cells via stable transfection. The expression profile of the Bcl-2 family proteins was determined by Western blot analysis. Chemosensitivity of the transfected cells was measured by Trypan blue exclusion assay and XTT reduction assay during drug application. In the absence of Bax protein, HepG2 cells with elevated Bcl-2 protein levels did not exhibit any significant increase in chemosensitivity towards the drugs. Transfected cells with reduced Bcl-XL levels became more sensitive to the drugs, and a significant difference in IC50 values was observed. The chemosensitivity of HepG2 cells to Taxol and Doxorubicin was not affected by Bcl-2 levels, while reduction of Bcl-XL levels rendered the cells more sensitive to the drugs. This suggests that the Bcl-2 protein alone could not protect HepG2 cells from drug-induced apoptosis, and that the Bcl-XL protein may be a target for gene therapy in hepatoblastoma treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".