Window query processing for joining data streams with relations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Query processing for data streams raises challenges that cannot be directly handled by existing database management systems (DBMS). Most related work in the literature mainly focuses on developing techniques for a dedicated data stream management system (DSMS). These systems typically either do not permit joining data streams with conventional relations or simply convert relations to streams before joining. In this paper, we present techniques to process queries that join data streams with relations, without treating relations as special streams. We focus on a typical type of such queries, called star-streaming joins. We process these queries based on the semantics of (sliding) window joins over data streams and apply a load shedding approximation when system resources are limited. A recently proposed window join approximation based on importance semantics for data streams is extended in this paper to maximize the total importance of the approximation result of a star-streaming join. Both online and offline approximation algorithms are discussed. Our experimental results demonstrate that the presented techniques are quite promising in processing star-streaming joins to achieve the maximum total importance of their approximation results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it