Differences in type II collagen degradation between peripheral and central cartilage of rat stifle joints after cranial cruciate ligament transection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Type II collagen degradation is thought to be the key process in cartilage degradation during the development of osteoarthritis (OA). In this study, we investigated the kinetics of type II collagen degradation during surgically induced OA. METHODS: Experimental OA was induced in male Wistar rats by transecting the cranial (anterior) cruciate ligament (CCL). Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used to study overall cartilage degradation, while immunostained sections were used to demonstrate denatured type II collagen (Col2-3/4m antibody) and the collagenase cleavage site in type II collagen (Col2-3/ 4Cshort antibody). RESULTS: During the first 3-4 weeks, cartilage destruction, associated with chondrocyte death, proteoglycan depletion, and a marked increase in the collagenase cleavage neoepitope, was mainly located at the margins of the cartilage. From weeks 3-4, the central part of the cartilage showed increased surface fibrillation and apparent chondrocyte death. In these areas, increased denatured type II collagen staining but little cleavage-site staining was present. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that cartilage degradation after CCL transection in the rat consists of 2 phases. An early phase located at the cartilage margins and a late phase located at the central part of the cartilage. In the early phase, collagenase-dependent cartilage damage occurred. During the late phase, the level of type II collagen denaturation increased.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".