A deep convolutional neural network using heterogeneous pooling for trading acoustic invariance with phonetic confusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We develop and present a novel deep convolutional neural network architecture, where heterogeneous pooling is used to provide constrained frequency-shift invariance in the speech spectrogram while minimizing speech-class confusion induced by such invariance. The design of the pooling layer is guided by domain knowledge about how speech classes would change when formant frequencies are modified. The convolution and heterogeneous-pooling layers are followed by a fully connected multi-layer neural network to form a deep architecture interfaced to an HMM for continuous speech recognition. During training, all layers of this entire deep net are regularized using a variant of the “dropout” technique. Experimental evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of both heterogeneous pooling and dropout regularization. On the TIMIT phonetic recognition task, we have achieved an 18.7% phone error rate, lowest on this standard task reported in the literature with a single system and with no use of information about speaker identity. Preliminary experiments on large vocabulary speech recognition in a voice search task also show error rate reduction using heterogeneous pooling in the deep convolutional neural network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".