MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036249897 · doi:10.5539/mas.v3n3p143

A Study on Cold Forging Die Design Using Different Techniques

2009· article· en· W2036249897 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForgingDie (integrated circuit)Manufacturing engineeringProcess (computing)Mechanical engineeringFinite element methodProcess designDurabilityMaterial flowForming processesEngineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringWork in processOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is becoming increasingly essential to predict the exact behavior of cold forging die during the forging process and it is also important to optimize the die design for its durability and to reduce the production cost of the die. Optimization of cold forging die design is required to reduce the production cost of die as well as the forged part and also to increase the accuracy of the die and the forged part. Since the past few years computer aided engineering (CAE) techniques have been widely used for research in metal forming. Amongst them finite element analyses (FEA) have been greatly successful to provide the understanding of metal flow and die stresses for different forming processes. The present work is a review of the existing die design techniques which are used in forging process to enhance the die design and to optimize die design process which will improve the performance of die. In cold forging the die will under go high loads, hence it is essential to know Fatigue behavior and Fatigue Failure of the die when it has been under go cyclic loading. The study end up with future challenges of the die design and its processes, the approaches adopted to develop an optimum system that can fulfill the customer demand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it