Selective anteromedial bundle reconstruction in partial ACL tears: a series of 36 patients with mean 24 months follow‐up
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe an original technique of reconstruction of the anteromedial bundle preserving the posterolateral bundle and to report the results of a consecutive 36 patients series with mean 24 months follow-up. Our hypothesis is that this selective reconstruction of ACL partial tears could restore knee stability and function. In a consecutive series of 256, ACL reconstructions, 36 patients in which intact ACL fibers remained in the location corresponding to the posterolateral bundle were perioperatively diagnosed. These patients (21 women and 15 men) underwent isolated reconstruction of the anteromedial bundle while keeping the remaining fibers intact. AM bundle reconstructions were performed by the same surgeon using an outside-in technique. A quadrupled hamstring graft was used in 20 patients and a doubled semitendinosus graft in 16 patients. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 32 years (min 15, max 53). The delay between injury and surgery was 6.6 months (min 2, max 35). Patients were assessed with the IKDC ligament evaluation form. Instrumented knee testing was performed with the Rolimeter arthrometer. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the preoperative and postoperative objective evaluation. Eleven concomitant meniscal lesions at the time of reconstruction were found. One patient who underwent a traumatic graft rupture at 4 months post surgery and two patients with previous contralateral ACL reconstruction were excluded, leaving 33 patients for final evaluation. Three reoperations were performed, including two arthrolysis for cyclops syndrome and one revision for a traumatic graft rupture. At last follow-up, 24 (73%) patients were graded A, 8 (24%) graded B and 1 C (3%) at IKDC objective evaluation. Mean side to side instrumented laxity was 4.8 mm (min 3, max 6) preoperatively and 0.8 mm (min 0, max 2) postoperatively. AM bundle reconstruction with an outside-in technique remains simple and reproducible. The preliminary results are encouraging with excellent side to side laxity. Graft size should probably be adapted to limit cyclops syndrome occurrence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".