Reflex-Mediated Reduction in Human Cerebral Blood Volume
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adrenergic nerves innervate the human cerebrovasculature, yet the functional role of neurogenic influences on cerebral hemodynamics remains speculative. In the current study, regional cerebrovascular responses to sympathoexcitatory reflexes were evaluated. In eight volunteers, contrast-enhanced computed tomography was performed at baseline, -40 mmHg lower body negative pressure (LBNP), and a cold pressor test (CPT). Cerebral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), and cerebral blood flow (CBF) were evaluated in cortical gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and basal ganglia/thalamus (BGT) regions. Lower body negative pressure resulted in tachycardia and decreased central venous pressure while mean arterial pressure was maintained. Cold pressor test resulted in increased mean arterial pressure concomitant with tachycardia but no change in central venous pressure. Neither reflex altered end-tidal carbon dioxide. Cerebral blood volume was reduced in GM during both LBNP and CPT (P<0.05) but was unchanged in WM and BGT. Mean transit time was reduced in WM and GM during CPT (P<0.05). Cerebral blood flow was only modestly affected with either reflex (P<0.07). The combined reductions in GM CBV (approximately -25%) and MTT, both with and without any change in central venous pressure, with small CBF changes (approximately -11%), suggest that active venoconstriction contributed to the volume changes. These data demonstrate that CBV is reduced during engagement of sympathoexcitatory reflexes and that these cerebrovascular changes are heterogeneously distributed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".