Impacts of using polyethylene sleeves and wavelength selective mulch in vineyards. I. Effects on air and soil temperatures and degree day accumulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effects on soil and air temperatures of wavelength-selective polyethylene mulch applied in planted rows, and clear polyethylene enclosures (sleeves) applied around vine canes or cordons for 7 wk in the spring were determined in three Merlot vineyards in the Okanagan Valley, British Columbia. Three sleeve configurations were studied: single-layer and closed at bottom; single-layer with bottom ventilation added after 5 wk; and double-layer with bottom ventilation added after 5 wk. All sleeves were perforated at the top between two supporting trellis catch wires, and were stapled closed at the bottom under the cordon or cane. Sleeve removal was either all at once or in two stages by first opening the top then removing the sides 6 d later. The sleeves increased mean air temperatures by ca. 1 to 2°C and maximum temperatures by ca. 5 to 8°C, and decreased minimum temperatures by ca. 1 to 2 °C, depending on the vineyard, measurement period, and sleeve configuration. Adding bottom ventilation to sleeves increased the mean minimum nighttime temperature by ca. 1°C at one vineyard but had no effect at the other two sites. Degree day (base 10°C) accumulati on inside sleeves was 1.5 to 2 times that of ambient, depending on the site, which increased total degree day accumulations for the season by 4.1 to 7.9%. The polyethylene mulch increased soil temperatures by ca. 2°C continuously over the diurnal period at two of the vineyards, but at the third where there was significant weed growth under the mulch the increase was less and only at night. Key words: Wine grapes, plasticulture
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".