MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036434682 · doi:10.1186/cc5436

Buccal visible light spectroscopy and laser Doppler flowmetry: reliability analysis

2007· article· en· W2036434682 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vivian Gath, Yasser Sakr, Stefan Klinzing, T Simon, Konrad Reinhart, G. Marx

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBayer Canada
KeywordsMedicineLaser Doppler velocimetryReliability (semiconductor)Buccal administrationDoppler effectBuccal mucosaSpectroscopyOpticsInternal medicineDentistryOral cavityBlood flow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are insatiable demands for new technologies to advance basic biological investigation at the microcirculatory level. Oxygen to see (O 2 C) is a newly developed system that combines laser Doppler flow (LDF) and visible light spectroscopy (VLS) technology. The aim of our study was to assess the reliability of O 2 C measurements applied to the buccal mucosa and to the thenar eminence in healthy volunteers. Microcirculatory hemoglobin oxygen saturation (μHbO 2 , %) and blood flow (flow, AU) were measured using an O 2 C (Lea Medizintechnik GmbH, Giessen, Germany) probe applied to the buccal mucosa and to the thenar eminence. Measurements were obtained simultaneously at two depths, superficial (2 mm) and deep (6 mm), every 2 seconds for 5 minutes and were recorded for later analysis. The procedure was repeated on another occasion at least 1 week apart. We studied 20 healthy subjects; 10 males and 10 females (mean age = 38 ± 18 years, range 21–74 years). Both μHbO 2 and flow measurements were consistently higher when measured from the deep tissue layers (6 mm) than those measured from the superficial layers, regardless of the site of measurement. Buccal mucosal μHbO 2 ranged from 78% to 96% and varied only minimally (CV: 4–7.5%), whereas there was a marked variability in flow measurements (CV: 29–63.9%). The reproducibility of buccal mucosal μHbO 2 and flow measurements were moderate to good (that is, intra-individual reliability, ICC: range 0.7–0.87, P < 0.05). However, only measurements from the superficial mucosal layers showed a moderate to good degree of inter-individual agreement (that is, inter-individual reliability, ICC: range 0.68–85, P < 0.001). LDF and VLS values measured on the thenar eminence were highly variable, were not reproducible, and the inter-individual agreement was poor. O 2 C provides reliable measurement of buccal μHbO 2 and microvascular flow. Skin measurements on the thenar eminence are highly variable and unreliable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical CareSame topicNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesFrench-language works237,207