Low Incidence of Ototoxicity With Continuous Infusion of Cisplatin in the Treatment of Pediatric Germ Cell Tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cisplatin is an important chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of many pediatric malignancies, but its use is limited in part by ototoxicity. The authors' institution has been administering standard-dose cisplatin by continuous infusion rather than bolus administration in germ cell tumors. The authors retrospectively reviewed 39 patients with germ cell tumors requiring chemotherapy over the past 20 years and recorded data including demographics, cumulative cisplatin dose, degree of ototoxicity (by the Brock grading system), and disease outcome. The median age was 9.4 years and the majority of children (48.7%) had endodermal sinus tumor. Twenty-one children received 400 mg/m of cisplatin or more. One child had evidence of significant ototoxicity at last follow-up (6.64 years after diagnosis). This patient received a total cumulative dose of 500 mg/m of cisplatin. Eighty-two percent of children achieved clinical remission of their disease. The authors conclude that continuous administration of cisplatin is associated with minimal ototoxicity while maintaining good tumoricidal efficacy, and further studies using this regimen are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".