The Effects of Two Rearing Salinities on Survival and Stress of Winter Flounder Broodstock
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine rearing conditions that would improve the survival of broodstock of winter flounder Pleuronectes americanus. We hypothesized that keeping wild winter flounder in iso-osmotic water would reduce the energy costs related to osmoregulation; the resulting energy gain could then be used for growth or immune responses. Eighty fish were randomly separated into four tanks, two containing seawater (SW; 28.7 ± 0.9‰ (mean ± SD)) and two containing brackish water (BW; 14.7 ± 1.7‰). Fish were sampled after 2 and 5 months of captivity for evaluation of their condition and stress status. Between the second and fifth months, the condition index increased significantly in both salinity groups, whereas body water content decreased. No salinity effect in terms of growth, condition, or energy reserves was found. However, the fish in BW showed much lower mortality. We found that the fish in SW had higher levels of the physiological indicators of stress than those in BW, which could have increased the risk of opportunistic infections in the former. Also, thrombocytes were absent in the SW fish after 2 months of captivity, which may have contributed to some mortalities. The lower resistance of certain opportunistic pathogens to BW is another possible explanation as to why fish in BW had lower occurrences of infectious diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".