EXPERIMENTS ON AIR-BLAST ATOMIZATION OF VISCOELASTIC LIQUIDS, PART 1: QUIESCENT CONDITIONS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Motivated by the need to improve spray coating, an experimental investigation into viscoelastic atomization using preformulated model test liquids is presented. These test liquids had similar values of surface tension, density, and rate-independent shear viscosity, but varying extensional viscosity. Through the use of these test liquids, the effects of elasticity were systematically isolated and found to act against the breakup of a spray issuing from a plain-jet air-blast atomizer. Flash photography revealed large-scale filamentary structures at breakup, which delayed discrete droplet formation until farther downstream, where relative air-liquid velocities were reduced. The lower relative velocities near breakup produced an increase in the volumetric median diameter, as was confirmed by analysis of high-magnification shadowgraphs. The hindering influence of elasticity on atomization was further substantiated through particle image velocimetry measurements, which indicated that the elastic droplets, owing to their greater inertia, were better able to maintain their initial momentum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it