MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036524501 · doi:10.1155/wcn.2005.20

Adaptive Denoising and Equalization of Infrared Wireless CDMA System

2005· article· en· W2036524501 on OpenAlexaff
Xavier Fernando, Balakanthan Balendran

Bibliographic record

VenueEURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMultipath propagationProcess gainBandwidth (computing)CDMA spectral efficiencyElectronic engineeringFilter (signal processing)WirelessTelecommunicationsCode division multiple accessEqualization (audio)Interference (communication)Raised-cosine filterNoise (video)Adaptive filterReal-time computingSpread spectrumRoot-raised-cosine filterChannel (broadcasting)Low-pass filterAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrared has abundant, unregulated bandwidth enabling rapid deployment at low cost. However, safety limits on power emission levels (IEC825), large noise due to ambient lighting, and multipath dispersion remain as hurdles in diffused indoor environments. Especially, the high-frequency periodic interference produced by fluorescent lights is a major concern. Spread spectrum techniques enable low-power operation and noise rejection, at the expense of large processing gain. In this paper, we quantify the noise received and propose an adaptive FIR filter to jointly cancel the multipath dispersion and the fluorescent light noise in an infrared CDMA system. From analytical and simulation results, the adaptive filter significantly enhances the noise rejection capability of the CDMA system and tracks well the quasistationary indoor wireless channel. Our results show tenfold improvement in the BER for a given SNR and processing gain due to the adaptive filter. The filter also performs well in the multiuser environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and NetworkingSame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207