MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036529052 · doi:10.1051/rnd:2005010

Ovarian effects of a high lactose diet in the female rat

2005· article· en· W2036529052 on OpenAlexaff
Gentao Liu, Fangxiong Shi, Uriel Blas‐Machado, Quynh Duong, Vicki L. Davis, Warren G. Foster, Claude L. Hughes

Bibliographic record

Venueannales de biologie animale biochimie biophysique · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDigestive system and related health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University Medical Centre
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsLactoseGalactoseEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyOvaryOvarian folliclePhysiologyMedicineFood scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Young women with galactosemia experience ovarian failure at a very early age raising concern about the ovarian toxicity of galactose. While galactose may be present in the diet as a monosaccharide, it is predominantly derived from cleavage of the disaccharide lactose within the intestine. Our previous studies in animals have shown that high galactose diets inhibit ovarian follicular development and long-term exposure to high lactose diets retards growth of rats. The objective of the present study was to determine whether galactose exposure in the form of dietary lactose mimics the effects found previously with diets rich in galactose. Sixty female Long-Evans rats (25-day-old) were randomly assigned to two groups and fed a control diet (41.9% glucose in AIN93G [American Institute of Nutrition], CON) before lactose treatment. Unilateral ovariectomy (uOVX) was performed on half of the rats in each group to determine baseline ovarian follicle numbers. The study diet was a high lactose diet (HLD) containing 41.9% lactose in AIN93G. Study diet exposure started 1 month after uOVX (3 months old) and continued for 7 months in the treatment group. The control group remained on the 41.9% glucose diet throughout. Vaginal cytology, ovarian morphometric analyses, and serum concentrations of estradiol and progesterone were examined. Long-term exposure to the HLD decreased the body weights of animals and progesterone concentrations in the serum but produced no harmful effects on ovarian morphology or function. Beginning at 5 months of age (two months of lactose treatment) increasing numbers of females began to cycle irregularly but there was no difference between the glucose and lactose diet groups. These negative findings imply that administration of galactose in the form of lactose seems to be much less toxic than when galactose is fed to animals. From a human health perspective, these results are somewhat reassuring, since in general, women eat lactose-containing foods rather than foods that contain large amounts of free galactose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueannales de biologie animale biochimie biophysiqueSame topicDigestive system and related healthFrench-language works237,207