MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Medication changes based on echocardiography in dialysis patients

2009· article· en· W2036545235 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chun K. CHONG, Michael Muzoora, George J. Eckert, Masoor Kamalesh, Sharon M. Moe

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDialysisInternal medicineHemodialysisKidney diseaseCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kidney/Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines recommend baseline echocardiography at the initiation of dialysis and every 3 years thereafter in patients for early detection of cardiac disease to optimize medical therapy. Because dialysis patients are at increased cardiovascular risk and thus most are already on cardioprotective medications, we hypothesize that serial screening echocardiography will not alter cardioprotective medications in dialysis patients. Retrospective analysis of medication administration of 231 dialysis patients was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups, those with and those without echocardiograms. Medication changes post echocardiography were compared with subjects without echocardiograms at comparable time points. The primary end point was the number of medication class changes that occurred in 2 months post echocardiography. Medication classes examined were beta blockers (BB), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB), nitrates, calcium channel blockers (CCB), and statins. In the Echo group, there were 29 (19%) subjects with at least 1 medication class change post echocardiography, compared with 121 (81%) subjects without change. The number of patients on specific medication classes before and after echocardiography were BB (90 [60%] vs. 97 [65%], P=0.05), ACEI/ARB (74 [49%] vs. 82 [55%], P=0.01), nitrates (34 [23%] vs. 33 [22%], P=0.56), CCB (77 [51%] vs. 79 [53%], P=0.56), and statins (69 [46%] vs. 70 [47%], P=0.71). When compared with the No Echo group, there was no significant change in number of any medication classes. The occurrence of medication changes post echocardiography in dialysis patients is low and is not different than changes in routine care of dialysis patients without echocardiograms. Thus, serial screening echocardiography may not have added benefit to optimizing medical management of cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients. Further studies are warranted to demonstrate evidence for the use of serial screening echocardiography in this high-risk population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→