MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036573870 · doi:10.1109/mmbia.2012.6164758

Learning features for streak detection in dermoscopic color images using localized radial flux of principal intensity curvature

2012· article· en· W2036573870 on OpenAlexaff
Hengameh Mirzaalian, Tim K. Lee, Ghassan Hamarneh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer AgencySimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)StreakFeature (linguistics)Computer sciencePrincipal component analysisCurvaturePopulationSupport vector machineComputer visionMathematicsMedicinePhysicsOpticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malignant melanoma (MM) is one of the most frequent types of cancers among the world's white population. Dermoscopy is a noninvasive method for early recognition of MM by which physicians assess the skin lesion according to the skin subsurface features. The presence or absence of “streaks” is one of the most important dermoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of MM. We develop a machine-learning approach for identifying streaks in dermoscopic images using a novel melanoma feature, which captures the quaternion tubularness in the color dermoscopic images, is sensitive to the radial features of streaks, and is localized to different lesion bands (e.g. the most periphery band where streaks commonly appear). We validate the classification accuracy of SVM using our novel features on 99 dermoscopic images (including images in the absence, presence of regular, and presence of irregular streaks). Compared to state-of-the-art, we obtain improved classification results by up to 9% in terms of area under ROC curves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207