MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036611166 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.30020

<i>CDKN1C</i> mutation in Wiedemann–Beckwith syndrome patients reduces RNA splicing efficiency and identifies a splicing enhancer

2004· article· en· W2036611166 on OpenAlexaff
J. Lew, Yan Ling Fei, Kirk Aleck, Benjamin J. Blencowe, Rosanna Weksberg, Paul D. Sadowski

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNA splicingBeckwith–Wiedemann syndromeGeneticsEnhancerExonic splicing enhancerMutationBiologyRNAComputational biologyGeneGene expressionDNA methylation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wiedemann-Beckwith syndrome (WBS) is a human overgrowth disorder that is accompanied by an increased risk of embryonal tumors and is associated with dsyregulation of the imprinting of genes in chromosome 11p15.5. Maternally inherited mutations in the imprinted CDKN1C gene are known to be associated with WBS. We have identified a novel mutation in several members of a large family affected by WBS. The mutation is a G --> T change in a run of seven G's near the 5' splice site of intron 3. All obligate carriers and affected individuals carry the mutation, and in each affected case, the allele was inherited maternally, strongly suggesting a role in causing WBS. The mutation is located in a poly-G tract in the intron; intronic G-rich sequences in other genes have been shown to have a role in promoting splicing. In transfected 293HEK cells, we found that the G --> T mutation reduced splicing efficiency. Mutation of all seven G's in the poly-G tract further reduced splicing efficiency, supporting a role for the G-tract as a splicing enhancer. The fibroblasts of one affected patient showed a similar reduction in splicing efficiency. Maternal monoallelic expression of CDKN1C was verified in this patient cell line. However, the total amount of spliced message was not reduced by the mutation in spite of the reduced efficiency of splicing. We discuss the possible role of the splicing defect in the pathogenesis of WBS in this pedigree.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingFrench-language works237,207