MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P1-08-15: Pattern of Cardiac Monitoring and Risk of Trastuzumab Associated-Cardiac Dysfunction in a Clinical Practice: A Population Based Study.

2011· article· en· W2036614336 on OpenAlexaffabout
Richard M. Lee‐Ying, C. Ubhi, Sam Roberts, Hyeyeun Lim, Himani V. Bhatt, Kathy Gesy, Syed Waqar Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Cancer AgencyUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTrastuzumabInternal medicineBreast cancerEjection fractionAnthracyclinePopulationCardiologyIncidence (geometry)OncologyLogistic regressionCancerGynecologyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Adjuvant trastuzumab therapy (ATT) in women with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer has been associated with significant reduction in the disease recurrence and mortality. Cardiac dysfunction (CD) is a known serious adverse effect of ATT. Although periodic cardiac monitoring is recommended during ATT, little is known about pattern of cardiac monitoring and incidence of CD in a clinical setting. The study aimed to determine extent of cardiac monitoring and rate of CD during ATT and to identify factors correlated with CD. Methods: Medical records of women with localized HER+ breast cancer diagnosed between the years 2005–2007 in the province of Saskatchewan was reviewed. Women with advanced or recurrent disease or if they were treated in the setting of an adjuvant trastuzumab trial were excluded. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine various clinical variables correlated with CD. Results: A total 116 eligible women with median age of 54 yrs (range: 27–74) and median BMI of 27 (range: 44–17) were indentified. 40% had a cardiac risk factor & 30% were premenopausal. 51% had node positive & 53% had ER or PR+ breast cancer. 92% received anthracycline-based chemotherapy and 23% received sequential ATT. Of 62 patients with ER/PR+ breast cancer, 61% received adjuvant aromatase inhibitors. Baseline cardiac assessment was performed in 93% women. 98% women underwent periodic cardiac monitoring during ATT, 55% had monitoring performed at the interval of 3–4 months & 82% women had monitoring performed at the interval of 3–6 months. Mean baseline cardiac ejection fraction (EF%) prior to the commencement of chemotherapy and ATT were 65% & 63.9% respectively (p=NS). CD was observed in 32 (28%) women and only 4% were symptomatic. Trastuzumab was interrupted in 34%, and was discontinued in 20% women. Of 32 women with CD, 59% were referred to a cardiologist and 53% were treated with medication. CD was reversible in 84% cases. On multivariate analysis adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy was significantly correlated with cardiac dysfunction (Odd ratio 6.9 [95% CI: 1.4−33.0]). During the follow up period 18% women developed recurrent disease and 16% were died. Conclusions: Our results confirm high compliance with cardiac monitoring, though not as frequently as recommended in the clinical trial setting. Overall the rate of symptomatic decline in cardiac function was similar to the rate reported in the clinical trials, however, a relatively higher incidence of asymptomatic decline in the left ventricle EF% was noted. Among various variables examined, adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy was associated with an increased risk of CD. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-15.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207