MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036614523 · doi:10.1016/s0828-282x(07)71003-6

Predict, prevent and personalize: Genomic and proteomic approaches to cardiovascular medicine

2007· review· en· W2036614523 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Maral Ouzounian, Douglas S. Lee, Anthony O. Gramolini, Andrew Emili, Masahiro Fukuoka, Peter P. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesDalhousie UniversityUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePersonalized medicinePrecision medicineGenomicsGenomic medicineDiseasePharmacogeneticsBioinformaticsIntensive care medicineComputational biologyPathologyGenomeGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genomic and proteomic approaches to cardiovascular medicine promise to revolutionize our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This improved appreciation of pathophysiology may be translated into avenues of clinical utility. Gene-based presymptomatic prediction of illness, finer diagnostic subclassifications and improved risk assessment tools will permit earlier and more targeted intervention. Pharmacogenetics will guide our therapeutic decisions and monitor response to therapy. Personalized medicine will require the integration of clinical information, stable and dynamic genomics, and molecular phenotyping. Bioinformatics will be crucial in translating these data into useful applications, leading to improved diagnosis, prediction, prognostication and treatment. The present paper reviews the potential contributions of genomic and proteomic approaches in developing a more personalized approach to cardiovascular medicine. Genomic and proteomic approaches to cardiovascular medicine promise to revolutionize our understanding of disease initiation and progression. This improved appreciation of pathophysiology may be translated into avenues of clinical utility. Gene-based presymptomatic prediction of illness, finer diagnostic subclassifications and improved risk assessment tools will permit earlier and more targeted intervention. Pharmacogenetics will guide our therapeutic decisions and monitor response to therapy. Personalized medicine will require the integration of clinical information, stable and dynamic genomics, and molecular phenotyping. Bioinformatics will be crucial in translating these data into useful applications, leading to improved diagnosis, prediction, prognostication and treatment. The present paper reviews the potential contributions of genomic and proteomic approaches in developing a more personalized approach to cardiovascular medicine. Les approches génomiques et protéomiques de la médecine cardiovasculaire promettent de révolutionner la compréhension de l’apparition et de l’évolution de la maladie. Cette meilleure appréciation de la physiopathologie peut se traduire par des solutions d’utilité clinique. La prévision présymptomatique des maladies d’après les gènes, une sousclassification diagnostique plus précise et des outils d’évaluation du risque améliorés permettront d’effectuer des interventions plus précoces et plus ciblées. La pharmacogénétique orientera les décisions thérapeutiques et la surveillance des réponses aux thérapies. La médecin personnalisée exigera l’intégration d’information clinique, de génomique stable et dynamique et du phénotypage moléculaire. La bioinformatique sera essentielle pour traduire ces données en applications utiles, afin de parvenir à une amélioration du diagnostic, de la prédiction, de la pronostication et du traitement. Le présent article contient l’analyse des apports potentiels des approches génomiques et protéomiques pour mettre au point une démarche plus personnalisée de la médecine cardiovasculaire. Les approches génomiques et protéomiques de la médecine cardiovasculaire promettent de révolutionner la compréhension de l’apparition et de l’évolution de la maladie. Cette meilleure appréciation de la physiopathologie peut se traduire par des solutions d’utilité clinique. La prévision présymptomatique des maladies d’après les gènes, une sousclassification diagnostique plus précise et des outils d’évaluation du risque améliorés permettront d’effectuer des interventions plus précoces et plus ciblées. La pharmacogénétique orientera les décisions thérapeutiques et la surveillance des réponses aux thérapies. La médecin personnalisée exigera l’intégration d’information clinique, de génomique stable et dynamique et du phénotypage moléculaire. La bioinformatique sera essentielle pour traduire ces données en applications utiles, afin de parvenir à une amélioration du diagnostic, de la prédiction, de la pronostication et du traitement. Le présent article contient l’analyse des apports potentiels des approches génomiques et protéomiques pour mettre au point une démarche plus personnalisée de la médecine cardiovasculaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CardiologySame topicBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksFrench-language works237,207