MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036680717 · doi:10.1055/s-2004-828604

Infants with Congenital Anomalies Admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Units

2004· article· en· W2036680717 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anne Synnes, Margaret Berry, Huw P Jones, Margaret Pendray, Shawn Stewart, Shoo K. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Perinatology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesCommunity Based Research CentreMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsMedicineIntensive careIncidence (geometry)PediatricsResource useSeverity of illnessIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to describe the congenital anomalies in 17 Canadian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and their impact on mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization. This study was performed using a database analysis of 19,507 consecutive admissions. Results show that 13.7% of admissions had one or more anomalies. There was wide variation in incidence between NICUs (4.4 to 36.6%). Congenital anomalies were associated with increased severity of illness, and higher mortality, morbidity, and resource use. Inclusion of congenital anomalies improves mortality prediction in regression analyses models. Congenital anomalies have a significant impact on NICU outcomes and resource use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of PerinatologySame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207