MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036691589 · doi:10.1194/jlr.p900008-jlr200

Replication of genetic associations with plasma lipoprotein traits in a multiethnic sample

2009· article· en· W2036691589 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew B. Lanktree, Sonia S. Anand, Salim Yusuf, Robert A. Hegele

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lipid Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersOntario Genomics InstituteGenome CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaOntario GenomicsPfizer
KeywordsGenome-wide association studySingle-nucleotide polymorphismSNPGeneticsBiologyPopulation stratificationGenetic epidemiologyPopulationGenetic associationInternal medicineBioinformaticsGenotypeMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have reproducibly identified loci associated with plasma triglycerides (TG), HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol. We sought to replicate these findings in a multiethnic population-based cohort using the curated single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) set found on the new Illumina cardiovascular disease (CVD) beadchip, which contains approximately 50,000 SNPs densely mapping approximately 2,100 genes, selected based on their potential role in CVD. The sample consisted of individuals with European (n = 272), South Asian (n = 330), and Chinese (n = 304) ancestry. Identity by state clustering successfully classified individuals according to self-reported ethnicities. Associations between TG and APOA5, TG and LPL, HDL and CETP, and LDL and APOE were all identified (P < 2 x 10(-6)). In 13 loci, associations with the same SNP or a proxy SNP were identified in the same direction as previously reported (P < 0.05). Assessing the cumulative number of risk-associated alleles at multiple replicated SNPs increased the proportion of explained lipoprotein variance over and above traditional variables such as age, sex, body mass index, and ethnicity. The findings indicate the potential utility of the Illumina CVD beadchip, but they underscore the need to consider meta-analysis of results from commonly studied clinical or epidemiological samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalmedium
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lipid ResearchSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207