Bibliographic record
Abstract
The flow structure of a tip vortex in the near field of a NACA 0015 wing with an effective aspect ratio of 5.04 undergoing a deep-stall oscillation with a(t) = 18 deg + 6 deg sin ωt at Re = 1.86 × 10 5 was investigated. The wing oscillation imposed a strong discrepancy in contour shapes and magnitudes between the pitch-up and pitch-down phases of the oscillation cycle. The vortex was more organized and nearly axisymmetric for x/c > 0.5 during pitch-up than during pitch-down. The peak tangential velocity and vorticity and the strength and size of the vortex increased with a(t), except in the vicinity of α max , and had higher values during pitch-up than during pitch-down. The axial flow was always wake like and the velocity deficit decreased with α(t), while exhibiting a sharp increase and decrease on the upstroke and downstroke in the vicinity of α max , respectively. The tangential velocity decreased slightly with the downstream distance. The vortex size increased rather significantly with x/c during pitch-down while remaining virtually unchanged during pitch-up. The inner region of the vortex exhibited a self-similar structure, similar to that of a stationary wing. The induced drag increased with a(t) and had a local maximum at 20 deg during pitch-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".