MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036769264 · doi:10.1109/tns.2014.2356641

SEL Cross Section Energy Dependence Impact on the High Energy Accelerator Failure Rate

2014· article· en· W2036769264 on OpenAlexaff
Rubén García Alía, E. W. Blackmore, Markus Brugger, Salvatore Danzeca, Veronique Ferlet-Cavrois, R. Gaillard, Julien Mekki, C. Poivey, K. Røed, Frédéric Saigné, Giovanni Spiezia, M. Trinczek, Sławosz Uznański, F. Wrobel

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCross section (physics)TungstenProtonNuclear physicsPhysicsEnergy (signal processing)Volume (thermodynamics)Beam (structure)Atomic physicsNuclear engineeringMaterials scienceOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use a single event latchup (SEL) model calibrated to heavy ion (HI) and proton data below 230 MeV to extrapolate the proton cross section to larger energies and evaluate the impact of the potential cross section increase with energy on the SEL rate in different environments. We show that in the case of devices with a large LET onset for HI and a certain amount of tungsten near the sensitive volume (SV), the calculated failure rates for energetic environments based on monoenergetic test data can significantly underestimate the real value. In addition, we show through measurements using a 480 MeV beam and an inspection of the device’s architecture that the model was successful in estimating the SEL cross section and tungsten volume per cell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicRadiation Effects in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207